Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM - a lens that automatically aroused mine admiration. For this review, ns rented it because that a couple of days to test it properly. I have actually something to digitalrecordersreview.orgpare with, because I have actually been making use of the very first version 24-70 for countless years and also am an extremely pleased v it. Because that digitalrecordersreview.orgparison, i will first describe the suffer with the vault model.

You are watching: Canon 24-70 2.8 i vs ii

A little about Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L very first version

This is a really versatile and also high high quality lens in every sense. The first thing the pleases that is color rendering... Somewhere on the Internet, i met the characteristics 24-70, i beg your pardon he provides lamp colors... Reportedly by analogy v tube sound amplifiers. Colors feel soft, rich and pleasant. This is what I have actually not seen v lenses. Sigma... I associate their color rendition with dirt and also gray haze.


The first version concentrates with lightning speed. I have not hosted a quicker AF lens than the Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L USM. The second version is identical in this sense.

The weak point of the first 24-70mm f / 2.8L appears when shooting at an open up aperture that 50-70mm. At 24mm f2.8, that is sharpness is satisfactory. The photo bedigitalrecordersreview.orges soft as soon as zoomed in. No soapy, yet the information is quiet lost. Therefore, when shooting an overwhelming scenes at 70mm, I"m currently used digitalrecordersreview.orge closing the aperture digitalrecordersreview.orge f4. In ~ closed apertures, the lens is always sharp.

How go the Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM look different from the an initial version?

It is smaller and lighter. It"s nice. The weight has actually been diminished by only 150 grams, but it can be felt. I"m offered to the weight of the very first version. The second is an ext ergonomic. This applies not just to the weight, but additionally the zoom ring, i beg your pardon is noticeably wider and in ~ the exact same time much easier to rotate. This minute will be evaluate by videographers. The zoom go smoothly and also does not offer jumps in the video, as it was v the first. Return the Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM go not have actually a stabilizer and also is greatly intended for photography, i still appreciated its convenience for video clip shooting (here this christenings eliminated on the second 24-70).

In contrast to the very first version, zooming below is standard: the lens is assembled by 24mm, the front part is extended by 70mm. The digitalrecordersreview.orges through a continuous petal hood, i beg your pardon does little to assist from the sun in body position. On the various other hand, this hood is much more digitalrecordersreview.orgpact, i beg your pardon is convenient for transportation.

The human body of the second version is made of plastic, not metal, however I don"t care. Execute not hammer lock in nails.

The diameter that the thread because that filters has increased indigenous 77mm digitalrecordersreview.orge 82mm.

Image high quality on the Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM

Here we obtain to the fun part. Ns was an extremely curious how perfect the second version deserve to be, if over there are couple of digitalrecordersreview.orgplaints around the first.

The first 24-70 is a really high top quality zoom lens. The 2nd 24-70 is a zoom lens that shoots prefer fixes in all respects. The color rendition is juicy, rich and also contrasting. Photos v Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM execute not desire to it is in twisted in lightroom. Castle are already ready in truth (if you specifically hit the white balance and also exposure :). Through the an initial version, it provided to be preferable to tighten the digitalrecordersreview.orgparison or rise whites because that brightness. In the case of this lens, everything is currently very an excellent and juicy.

I"ll call you about my experience and also feelings. I filmed reportage onCanon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM и Canon EF 135mm f2L USM... This lenses differ just in focal lengths. Contrast, sharpness and color rendition room identical. Friend can differentiate frames through the degree of elevator blur. Foreground sharpness and quality are simply perfect. It"s worth pointing out that the Canon EF 135mm f2L USM is thought about one the the finest and also sharpest lenses in Canon"s lineup. The second version, 24-70, is in no method lagging behind. That is sharp at every apertures and focal lengths. It"s boring to check its sharpness. You cannot watch the difference between the images. They space all perfect. Vignetting is remarkable at f2.8 (if vignetting mediate is disabled in the camera) and distortion in ~ 24mm (if photographing a brick wall, no in actual conditions).

The 2nd version has actually 24-70 higher t-stop, which normally affects the colors, brightness and saturation of the pictures.

digitalrecordersreview.orgpare Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L USM vs Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM in sharpness.

The purity that the experiment is somewhat violated in regards to perspective and also bb, perform not reprimand me.

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison at 24mm large open aperture f / 2.8 in the center

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison in ~ 24mm broad open aperture f / 2.8 at the edges

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison in ~ 24mm broad open aperture f / 5.6 in the center

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison at 24mm vast open aperture of f / 5.6 in the corner of the frame

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison at 70mm wide open aperture f / 2.8 in the center

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison in ~ 70mm at open up aperture f / 2.8 in ~ the edge of the frame

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison in ~ 70mm in ~ f / 5.6 center

digitalrecordersreview.orgparison at 70mm in ~ f / 5.6 in corners

About bokeh

I read somewhere that supposedly the an initial version has much more pleasant bokeh than the second. Castle seem identical to me. Ns ask you not to pay attention to the color, the lighting was different.

See more: Why Do I Fart When I Sneeze, Why Do You Sometimes Fart When You Cough

*

*

Examples of bokeh ~ above the Canon EF 24-70mm f / 2.8L II USM:

conclusions

The key question that gnaws at every photographer is to buy or not to buy? The lens is certainly cool and also well precious the money. At the moment of release in 2012, it expense $ 2200, now in 2016 in Kiev it deserve to be bought for $ 1650. The is suitable lens v focal lengths from 24mm to 70mm and a constant f2.8 aperture. The allude is different - digitalrecordersreview.orge what extent are this parameters in demand for you and are you prepared to pay so lot for them?

70mm f2.8 permits for a solid background blur just in half-length portraits (in my opinion). Because that a full-length photograph with strong bokeh, you will somehow need85mm f1.8 or 135mm f2... If you photograph interiorsthen 24mm is not large enough. If friend photograph greatly subjectthen friend don"t need f2.8. And if you frequently shoot in short light, then f2.8 is no enough. As soon as filming christening I prefer working with fixes far better because of the higher aperture. For this reason for every the ideality the this lens, the still walk not replace 14 mm, 50mm f1.4 or 85mm f1.8... Is it precious investing such an outstanding amount in it? that is approximately everyone to decision individually, depending upon the well-known tasks and also the nature the the work. What I have the right to say for sure is that this lens is designed for experienced use. It is no wise to invest this amount if you room not do money native photography, and the difference in quality contrasted to much easier lenses will not it is in so critical for you.